It's all about perceived Truth and what you can prove to be true with objectivity. You can prove a table solid by laying down your hand on top and it staying there.
Now ethics is only plausible if everyone is operating equally ethically, once a factor that does not comprehend or have insight into his account, one who consisciously can't understand social cues or read emotionally involved social situations, someone inept to the empathy of understanding some other points of view and then adjusting self. A Sociopath or Autistic person also even an That person nullifies the one side as well as the objective truth. An Autistic person who has no way to discern reason of the Morally and overall Justice of any virtue being interwoven, as to then be upheld by actually breaking it. Himself completely discredits a certain amount of valid perseception and sees it wrong to lie no matter the outcome even for the good to eventually preval. Is the one thing that keeps the issue in question.
Knowing enough to question reality but not knowing enough or having the right information to determine it either way. Or having only one perceived truth leaves it open for individual interpretation.
It's all about perceived Truth and what you can prove to be true with objectivity. You can prove a table solid by laying down your hand on top and it staying there.
Now ethics is only plausible if everyone is operating equally ethically, once a factor that does not comprehend or have insight into his account, one who consisciously can't understand social cues or read emotionally involved social situations, someone inept to the empathy of understanding some other points of view and then adjusting self. A Sociopath or Autistic person also even an That person nullifies the one side as well as the objective truth. An Autistic person who has no way to discern reason of the Morally and overall Justice of any virtue being interwoven, as to then be upheld by actually breaking it. Himself completely discredits a certain amount of valid perseception and sees it wrong to lie no matter the outcome even for the good to eventually preval. Is the one thing that keeps the issue in question.
Knowing enough to question reality but not knowing enough or having the right information to determine it either way. Or having only one perceived truth leaves it open for individual interpretation.