9 Comments
User's avatar
Mon0's avatar

Was not expecting this to be so unhinged but Natural Law is kind of asking for it.

Expand full comment
Silas Abrahamsen's avatar

What do you mean? It is simply explains obvious moorean truths in the simplest way possible!

Expand full comment
Rajat Sirkanungo's avatar

I think i remember Ed Feser arguing that oral sex is fine as long as the husband cums in her wife's vagina. So, the husband really needs to make sure that he flips his wife and cums in the vagina.

Expand full comment
Silas Abrahamsen's avatar

Thanks for the tip, I'll have to try that out next time--God bless!

Expand full comment
Jessie Ewesmont's avatar

Man, why does natural law stuff always come down to sex?

Expand full comment
Silas Abrahamsen's avatar

It's just the most important issue in ethics! If utilitarianism can't even get the categorical ban on using condoms right, then it's clearly failed on the most important case for any moral theory, and shouldn't even be taken seriously. How the theory handles cases of torture and whatnot is *far* less important...

Expand full comment
David McGee's avatar

Pegging Tuesday has to stop?!

Expand full comment
Silas Abrahamsen's avatar

I'm sorry 😔 But if you pay $5000 in indulgences God might be able to overlook it

Expand full comment
Bob Jacobs's avatar

Stahp!

Expand full comment